Journal

Anthropological-eshatological paradigm of christian apologists. Part I

№ 7, 2019

Anthropological-eshatological paradigm of christian apologists. Part I

priest Alexander Khoroshko

PhD, Head of the Department of Practical Sciences of Volyn Orthodox Theological Academy.

priest.a.khoroshko@vpba.edu.ua

Number DOI: http://doi.org/10.33209/2519-4348-2019-7-50

VB. – № 7, 2019. – P. 71-87

Summary

One of the major questions that have plagued humanity throughout its history has been the question of what kind of person it is for its purpose. Depending on the answer, outlines of purpose and meaning of life were obtained. Over the centuries, various philosophical systems have been created that sought to explore human nature. And they were all wrong. This is because you explain that all these philosophical systems, because of the narrowness of thinking, could not see the person in its entirety. Only with the revelation in the fullness of the Divine Revelation in the Person of the Lord Jesus Christ was it possible to understand man as created by the Divine design, which has a very special purpose. In order to understand the process of becoming a true doctrine of man, one must resort to the works of the first theologians of the Christian world, the early Christian apologists. Unlike the apostolic men, who addressed their works mainly to Christians, they had a controversy with the pagan audience, which left a mark on the range of problems they considered. The main task of the apologists was to unveil the basic truths of Christianity – the truth of God’s existence, the truth of the immortality of the soul of man, and the truth of Divine Revelation, since these provisions form the basis of the Christian religion. The apologists formed a new, Christian culture with its absolutely special anthropology and eschatology. Thus, being many pioneers in many issues, they paved the way for the further Christianization of Hellenism and the formation of a holistic system of Christian theology. The article traces the specifics of the formation of the Holy Father’s doctrine of man, the purpose of his life on earth and the afterlife based on the works of early Christian apologists I-III centuries. Given the volume of the article, the author resorted to its conditional division into three parts. The first part of the paper deals with the questions concerning the creation and purpose of man, the image and likeness of God in him, the balance of soul and spirit, sin and salvation.

Key words: anthropology, man, creation, purpose, soul, spirit, image and likeness of God, fall, salvation.

References:

1. The Bible. The Old and New Testament Scriptures: In Ukrainian with Parallel Sites (2004). Pereklad Patriarkha Filareta (Denysenka). K.: Vydannia Kyivskoi Patriarkhii Ukrainskoi Pravoslavnoi Tserkvy Kyivskoho Patriarkhatu [in Ukrainian]. 

2. Apologists: a collection of writings of ancient Christians apologists translated into Ukrainian. (2010). Pid red. Sviatiishoho Patriarkha Kyivskoho i vsiiei Rusy-Ukrainy Filareta; [per. ta peredm. do knyh prot. Kostiantyna Lozinskoho, Andriia Khromiaka ta Kostiantyna Moskaliuka; avtor vstup. st. Oleksandr Myronchuk]. K.: Vydavnychyi viddil UPTs Kyivskoho Patriarkhatu [in Ukrainian]. 

3. Bulushev A. (2011). Orthodox anthropology before the separation of the Church. M.: PSTHU [in Russian]. 

4. Epyfanovych S. (2010). Lectures on pathology (Church writing І-ІІІ centuries). Course of lectures given to students of the Kiev Theological Academy. Pod obshchei red. dots. MDA N. Y. Muraveva. SPb.: «Voskresenye» [in Russian]. 

5. Yrynei Lyonskyi. (2008). Against heresies. Proof of the Apostolic Sermon. Per. prot. P. Preobrazhenskoho, N. Y. Sahardы. SPb.: «Yzdatelstvo Oleha Abыshko» [in Russian]. 

6. Kypryan (Kern), arkhym. (1950). Anthropology of St. Gregory Palamas. Paryzh: YMCA-Press [in Russian]. 

7. Klyment Aleksandryiskyi. (2003). Stromates. Pod. E. V. Afonasyn. SPb.: «Yzdatelstvo Oleha Abыshko». T. 3 (Knyhy 6 – 7) [in Russian]. 

8. Klyment Aleksandryiskyi. (2006). Exhortation to the Gentiles. Which of the rich will be saved. Per. s drevnehrech., vstup. st., komment. y ukazatel A. Yu. Bratukhyna. SPb.: «Yzdatelstvo Oleha Abyshko» [in Russian]. 

9. Oryhen. (2008). About the beginnings. Against Celsus. SPb.: Byblyopolys [in Russian]. 

10. Severiukhyn A. (2014). Anthropological representations in the writings of St. Paul and Clement of Alexandria. Metaparadyhma: bohoslovye, fylosofyia, estestvoznanye: almanakh. SPb.: OOO «Yzdatelsko-polyhrafycheskaia kompanyia «KOSTA». Vyp. 4. [in Russian]. 

11. Sylvestr (Malevanskyi), ep. (1897). The experience of Orthodox dogmatic (theology with a historical exposition of dogmas): in 5 vol. K.: Typohrafyia Ymperatorskoho Unyversyteta Sv. Vladymyra T. 5. [VII] [in Russian]. 

12. Skvortsev K. (2007). Philosophy of Fathers and Teachers of the Church (Apologists Period). K.: Obshchestvo liubytelei pravoslavnoi lyteratury; Yzdatelstvo ymeny sviatytelia Lva, papy Rymskoho [in Russian]. 

13. Skurat K. (2006). Memoirs and works on pathology (I–V centuries). M.: Troytskyi sobor h. Yakhroma [in Russian]. 

14. The word of the pious emperor Justinian sent to Mina, the holiest and most blessed archbishop of the prosperous city and the patriarch, against the ungodly Origen and his indecent opinions. (2008). Deianyia Vselenskykh Soborov yzdannyia v russkom perevode pry Ymperatorskoi Kazanskoi Dukhovnoi Akademyy. SPb.: Voskresenye. T. 3-4: IV Sobor (chast Vtoraia), V, VI, VII Sobory. Yakhroma [in Russian]. 

15. Tertullyan Kvynt Septymyi Florens. (2004). About the soul. Per. s lat., vstup. st., komment. y ukazatel A. Yu. Bratukhyna. SPb.: «Yzdatelstvo Oleha Abyshko» [in Russian]. 

16. Fokyn A. (2005). Latin pathology. M.: Hreko-latynskyi kabynet Yu. A. Shychalyna, 2005. T. 1.: Peryod pervyi: Donykeiskaia latynskaia patrolohyia (150-325 hh.) [in Russian]. 

17. Fokyn A. (2009). Correlation of soul and spirit in Greek and Latin patristics. Human. M.: Nauka [in Russian].