The ‘Logos’ in the teaching of Marcellus of Ancyra and Sabellius
13.12.2024 2025-02-13 11:14The ‘Logos’ in the teaching of Marcellus of Ancyra and Sabellius
Eirini Artemi
candidate of Theology / Doctoral student in Ancient Greek and Byzantine Philosophy / Professor of Theology at the Greek Open University (Patra, Greece) / Academic Teacher of the Institute of Biblical Languages of the Jewish University (Jerusalem, Israel) / Professor of the Theological School of the Orthodox University (Kinshasa, Congo)
eartemi@theol.uoa.gr
Number DOI: http://doi.org/10.33209/2519-4348-2019-7-52
VB. – № 7, 2019. – P. 99-121
Summary
Marcellus of Ancyra tried with zeal to combat Arius, but he adopted the opposite extreme of modified Sabellianism. Marcellus taught that the Logos did not become a separate person until the incarnation, perhaps looking back to an earlier model of ‘two-stage’ Logos theology. This denial of a separate preexistent Son made Eusebius of Caesarea label his theology as ‘Sabellian’ throughout his text Against Marcellus. Marcellus’ dyo – prosopic christology is one in which the Logos, not as separate personal being, but as God himself in his activity, is joined to an man. On the other hand, Sabellius taught that the Logos or Word existed before the incarnation, but not as a distinct person, being immanent in the essence of the Deity as the divine reason. He was regarded as there in differing from St. John in the fourth gospel, denying that the Logos, the creating, revealing, and redeeming principle, is a person really and eternally distinct from the Father. In this paper we will try to compare the triadological teaching of Marcellus and of Sabellius in order to show Marcellus’ doctrine of the trinity isn’t a simple or successive modalism of Sabellius, although Eusebius of Caesarea may perhaps be excused for confusing it with Sabellianism. Unfortunately, the teaching of Sabellius is known to us only from a few fragments, and some of these not altogether consistent, in Athanasius of Alexandria, Gregory Nazianzen, Epiphanius of Cyprus and other fathers. To sum up if the God of Sabellianism was metamorphosed to meet the changing needs of the world, Marcellus’ God was expanded to meet the changing needs of the world.
Key words: Marcellus of Ancyra, Sabellianism, triadology, Logos, modalism.
References:
1. Artemi, E., ‘Emperor Constantine and the theology of Christianity from on his autocracy to the Second Ecumenical Council’, De Medio Aevo, Vol. 6.
2 (2014), 139–150. 2. Athanasius of Alexandria, Works, Athanasius Werke vol. ΙΙ, (Opitz, Urkunde, Berlin 1941).
3. Basil of Caesarea, Homily Against the Sabellians, Anomoians, and Pneumatomachians, 1, transl M. DelCogliano, On Christian Doctrine and Practice, Popular Patristics Series Volume 47, (St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, N.York, 2013), (277–303).
4. Basil of Caesarea, Epistles 69 and 125, PG 32, 429–433; 545–552.
5. Basil of Caesarea, Epistl. 207- To the clergy of Neocaesarea, Y. Courtonne, Saint Basile Lettres, vol. 2, (Les Belles Lettres, Paris 1961).
6. Boyarin, D. Border Lines, (University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, 2004).
7. Brandt, J.M., ‘Jürgen Moltmann, The Living God and the Fullness of Life, trans. Margaret Kohl. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2015, 242pages’, Journal of Lutheran Ethics, Vol. 16,2 (2016), http://elca.org/jle/articles/1143.
8. Cartwright, S., The image of God in Irenaeus, Marcellus of Ancyra and Eustathius of Antioch, in P. Foster, S. Parvis(eds), Irenaeus: life, scripture, legacy, (Fortress Press, Augsburg 2012), 173-81.
9. Clemens Alexandrinus, Protreptikus – Exhortation to the Greeks, PG 8, 49–245.
10. Cvetkovic, V., Ontologies of freedom and necessity: an investigation of the concepts of logos in Greek philosophy and Christian thought (Durham, 2001), http://etheses. dur.ac.uk/4269/.
11. Dalcour, E.L., A Definitive Look at Oneness Theology: Defending the Tri-unity of God, (Maryland, 2005).
12. Epiphanius of Salamis, Panarion-Against Eight Heresies, trans Benjamin Gleede, The Development of the Term ἐνυπόστατος from Origen to John of Damascus,(Supplements to Vigiliae Christianae), J. den Boeft, B.D. Ehrman, J. van Oort D.T. Runia, C. Scholten, J.C.M. van Winden (eds), Vol. 113, (Brill, Leiden – Boston 2012).
13. Eusebius of Caesarea, Against Marcellus; On Ecclesiastical Theology, E. Klostermann and G.C. Hansen. Eusebius Werke, Band 4: Gegen Marcell Über die kirchliche Theologie. Die Fragmente Marcells, ser. Die griechischen christlichen Schriftsteller 14, (Akademie – Verlag, Berlin 31989).
14. Gregory of Nyssa, To Ablabius, F. Mueller, Gregorii Nysseni Opera, III/1 (Brill, Leiden, 1958).
15. Hanson, R.P.C., The Search for the Christian doctrine of God, (T and T Clark, Edinburgh 1988).
16. Heraclitus the Ephesians, On Nature, in H. Diels, W. Kranz (eds.), Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker griechisch und deutsch, (Weidmannsche buchhandlung, 1903) fragments DK, B1 http://www.heraclitusfragments.com/files/ge.html. The English translation is by John Burnet’s in Early Greek Philosophy (London, 1920).
17. Isidore of Pelusium, Epistles, vol. 1–5, PG 78,15-1764.
18. Justin Martyr and Philosopher, Dialogue with Jew Trypho, PG 6, 471-801.
19. Kuiper, F.B.J. ‘Cosmogony and Conception: A Query’, History of Religions X, 2 (1970), 91–13, https://www.jstor.org/stable/1061905.
20. Lienhard, J., ‘Marcellus of Ancyra in modern research’, ThS 43 (1982), 486–503, in http://cdn.theologicalstudies.net/43/43.3/43.3.6.pdf
21. Lienhard, J., «Basil of Caesarea, Marcellus of Ancyra and «Sabellius»», Church History Vol. 58, No. 2 (Jun., 1989), 157-167, DOI: 10.2307/3168721.
22. Lienhard, J., «Did Athanasius Reject Marcellus?, in M.R. Barnes and D.H. Williams (eds.), Arianism After Arius: Essays on the Development of the Fourth Century Trinitarian Conflicts, (T and T Clark, Edinburgh, 1993), 65–80.
23. Lienhard, J., Contra Marcellum: Marcellus of Ancyra and Fourth Century Theology, (Catholic University of America Press, Washington D.C., 1999).
24. Lienhard, J., ‘Ousia and Hypostasis: The Cappadocian Settlement and the Theology of ‘One Hypostasis’», in S.T. Davis, D. Kendall, G. O’ Collins, (eds), The Trinity: An Interdisciplinary Symposium on the Trinity, (Oxford University Press, N.York, 2004), 99–122.
25. Long, A.A., Hellenistic Philosophy: Stoics, Epicureans, Sceptics, (Classical Life and Letter, Los Angeles, 1986), 234–7.
26. Marcellus of Ancyra, Epistula ad Iulium de Rome, in W. Kinzig and M. Vinzent, ‘Recent research on the origin of the creed’, Journal of Theological Studies, NS, Vol. 50.2, (October 1999), 535–559.
27. Moltman, J., The Trinity and the Kingdom. The doctrine of God, transl. by M. Kohl from the original German edition, (Fortress Press edition, USA 1993).
28. Morreland, J.P., Craig, W.L., Philosophical Foundations for a Christian Worldview, (InterVarsity Press, Madison 2017).
29. New Testament, Apostoliki Diakonia, (Athens, 2000).
30. Nicholson, H., The Spirit of Contradiction in Christianity and Buddhism, (Oxford University Press, N.York, 2016).
31. Origen of Alexandria, On First Principles, trans. by G.W. Butterworth, Origen On first Principles, (Wipf and Stock, Eugene – Oregon 2012).
32. Parvis, S., Marcellus of Ancyra and the Lost Years of the Arian Controversy 325–345, (Oxford Scholarship online www.oxfordscholarship.com, N.York, 2006).
33. Philo of Alexandria, Texts, http://www.earlyjewishwritings.com/text/philo/
34. Philo of Alexandria, Quis rerum divinarum heres sit, Leopoldus Cohn et Paulus Wendland (eds), Opera quae supersunt, Vol. 12, (1–71), (Berolini, 1898).
35. Quintus Septimus Tertullianus, Against Praxean, transl. by Al. Roberts, J. Donaldson, Ante-Nicene Christian Library: The writings of Tertullian, Vol. 2, (Edinburgh, 1870).
36. Ramelli, I., ‘Ethos and Logos: A second century debate between Pagan and Christian Philosophers’, Vigiliae Christianae, 69.2, (2015), 123–156. doi: 10.1163/15700720-12341205
37. Robertson, A.T., A Grammar of the Greek New Testament in the Light of Historical Research, (Broadman Press, Nashville, 1934).
38. Robertson, A.T., Word Pictures in the New Testament, B and H Publishing Group, Vol. 5 (1973) 4- 5.
39. Robertson, J.M., Christ as Mediator A Study of the Theologies of Eusebius of Caesarea, Marcellus of Ancyra and Athanasius of Alexandria, (Oxford University Press, N.York, 2007).
40. Sanford, J.A., Mystical Christianity: A psychological commentary on the gospel of John, (Crossroad, 1995).
41. Schaff, P., History of the Christian Church Vol. 2, (Revelation Insight Publishing Co., N.York, 2011).
42. Schaff, P., History of the Christian Church from the 1st to the 19th Century, vol. 3, (Delmarva publications, USA 2013), ebook.
43. Selvin, C., A philosophical study of sabdabrahman and logos, Savitribai Phule Pune University, 2009, p. 145, http://hdl.handle.net/10603/150658.
44. Spoerl-McCarthy, K., and Vinzent, M., Eusebius of Caesarea against Marcellus and On Ecclesiastical Theology, The Fathers of the Church, A new Translation, vol. 135, (The Catholic University of America Press, Washington D.C., 2017).
45. Sproul, R.C, Getting the Gospel Right: The Tie that Binds Evangelicals Together, (Baker publishing books, ebook edition, 2017)
46. Vinzent, M., Asterius von Kappadokien: Die Theologischen Fragmente, Einleitung, Kritischer Text, abersetzung und Kommentar, (Supplements to Vigiliae Christianae) 20 (Brill, Leidein, 1993)
47. Vinzent, M., Markell von Ankyra: Die Fragment: und der Briefan Julius von Rom, (Supplements to Vigiliae Christianae), vol. 39, (Brill, Leidein, 1997).
48. Wallace-Hadrill, D.S., Christian Antioch: A study of early Christian thought in the East, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008).
49. Winston, D., Logos and Mystical Theology in Philo of Alexandria, (Hebrew Union College Press, Cincinnati, 1985).
50. Zizioulas, J., About dogmatic theology and dogmata. Lectures in the university the academic year 1984-1985, (Athens, 1986).