Number DOI: http://doi.org/10.33209/2519-4348-2707-9627-2022-10-125

VB. – № 10, 2022. – P. 255-263

Summary

The study is devoted to the type of correlation between the level of trust in the church as a social institution and the struggle of ideological paradigms within the collective consciousness and collective imagination. This correlation is considered in the context of the total impact on the social and media processes of the post-truth situation. The concepts of the post-secular state of society are critically interpreted from the point of view of socio-cultural dynamics and defining tendencies of civilizational development. The relevance of the article is determined by the relevance of understanding the mechanisms of interaction and interaction of ideological constructs and trust in the church as an individual and group value guide for information security of society and a stable state of public opinion and mass consciousness. The aim of the article is to clarify the potential of implementing guidelines for critical thinking in social reflection on religion as a social institution and to raise the issue of another crisis actualization of the relationship between reason and faith in the history of human culture and civilization. An interpretation of the concept of post-truth on the subject of intelligence is proposed and an approach to understanding ideological constructs as triggers of attitude to the church and religion, as well as forms of influence on modern information and communication technologies. The conclusions contain provisions that reveal the formal and substantive aspects of the problem of correlation between trust in religion and the church as social institutions and ideologies in the post-truth situation, considered as the current state of affairs. Prospects for further research in this area are determined by the relevance of the topic, as well as the need for modern humanities to understand situational changes in the mechanisms of interaction between social and individual, trust in the church as a social institution as a value, ideologies as consolidating emotional and rational complexes of constructs (signs) individual faith in the conditions of post-truth domination and crisis of metanarratives.

Key words: church, religion, trust, ideology, post-truth.

References:

1. Boiko A. (2013). Relihiia i polityka v media: osoblyvosti spryiniattia informatsii molodizhnoiu audytoriieiu. Zbirnyk prats Naukovo-doslidnoho instytu presoznavstva. Vyp. 3. S. 307–319 [in Ukrainian].
2. Hovorun K. (2017). Postpravda. Public orthodoxy. 22 Sept. URL: https://publicorthodoxy.org/2017/09/22/%D0%BF%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B4%D0%B0/ [in Russian].
3. Hrynevych V. (2021). Viryty y doviriaty. Verbum. 23 chervnia. URL: https://www.verbum.com.ua/06/2021/the-media-problem/faith-and-trust/ [in Ukrainian].
4. Dovira do Tserkvy, yak moralnoho avtorytetu, zmenshuietsia, – doslidzhennia Tsentru Razumkova. (2019). RISU. Relihiino-informatsiina sluzhba Ukrainy. 14 lystopada. URL: https://risu.ua/dovira-do-cerkvi-yak-moralnogo-avtoritetu-zmenshuyetsya-doslidzhennya-centru-razumkova_n101090 [in Ukrainian].
5. Marchenko O. V., Kretov P. V., Kretova O. I. (2021). Post-truth and critical thinking: ideological implications in education.Liudynoznavchi studii: zbirnyk naukovykh prats Drohobytskoho derzhavnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu imeni Ivana Franka. Seriia «Filosofiia». Vyp. 43. Drohobych: Vydavnychyi dim «Helvetyka». S. 96–102 [in English].
6. Sotsialna napruzhenist u kryzovomu sotsiumi: sotsialnopsykholohichnyi analiz (2019); O. H. Zlobina, M. O. Shulha, L. D. Bevzenko ta in.; za nauk. red. O. H. Zlobinoi. Kyiv: In-t sotsiolohii NAN Ukrainy. 291 s [in Ukrainian].
7. Hejz, R. (2012). Vozrozhdenie voobrazhenija; per. s angl. L. Kolkera. Cherkassy: Kollokvium. 236 s [in Russian].
8. Chornomorets Yu. (2020). P. Kryza teorii postsekuliarnoho stanu suspilstva v ukrainskii teolohii. Naukovyi chasopys NPU imeni M. P. Drahomanova. Seriia 7. Vyp. 42 (55). S. 20–29 [in Ukrainian].
9. Shvab L. (2018). Liudyna i relihiia v modernomu sviti. Volynskyi blahovisnyk. № 6. S. 245–256 [in Ukrainian].
10. Andrejč, G. (2017). Religion, Truthfulness and the ‘Post-Truth’ Politics. Woolf Institute. 06 March. URL: https://www.woolf.cam.ac.uk/blog/religion-truthfulness-and-the-post-truth-politics  [in English]. 
11. Chua, L. (2017). What Religious Beliefs Reveal About Post-Truth Politics. Sapiens. Anthropology Magazine. 21 May. URL: https://www.sapiens.org/culture/post-truth-politics/ [in English].  
12. McIntyre, L. (2018). Post-Truth. MIT Press Essential Knowledge series. URL: https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/post-truth [in English].