{"id":6420,"date":"2025-12-18T13:15:55","date_gmt":"2025-12-18T11:15:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/vb.vpba.edu.ua\/?p=6420"},"modified":"2026-04-30T23:53:01","modified_gmt":"2026-04-30T20:53:01","slug":"a-sermon-lasting-a-decade-189-conversations-of-bishop-ireneus-falkovsky-on-eternal-punishments-genre-composition-polemic","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/vb.vpba.edu.ua\/uk\/a-sermon-lasting-a-decade-189-conversations-of-bishop-ireneus-falkovsky-on-eternal-punishments-genre-composition-polemic\/","title":{"rendered":"\u041f\u0440\u043e\u043f\u043e\u0432\u0456\u0434\u044c \u0434\u043e\u0432\u0436\u0438\u043d\u043e\u044e \u0432 \u0434\u0435\u0441\u044f\u0442\u0438\u043b\u0456\u0442\u0442\u044f: 189 \u0431\u0435\u0441\u0456\u0434 \u0454\u043f\u0438\u0441\u043a\u043e\u043f\u0430 \u0406\u0440\u0438\u043d\u0435\u044f (\u0424\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043a\u043e\u0432\u0441\u044c\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e) \u043f\u0440\u043e \u0432\u0456\u0447\u043d\u0456 \u043a\u0430\u0440\u0438 \u2013 \u0436\u0430\u043d\u0440, \u043a\u043e\u043c\u043f\u043e\u0437\u0438\u0446\u0456\u044f, \u043f\u043e\u043b\u0435\u043c\u0456\u043a\u0430"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n

<\/p>\n

\nBishop Anthony Firlei<\/strong><\/summary>\n

<\/p>\n

postgraduate student at Kyiv Orthodox Theological Academy.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

ORCID: orcid.org\/0000-0002-0418-659X | firley78@gmail.com<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n<\/details>\n

<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

Number DOI: http:\/\/doi.org\/10.33209\/2519-4348-2707-9627-2025-13-175<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Volynskyi Blahovisnyk. \u2116 13. 2025. P. 169-184.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Summary<\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

The article is devoted to the study of a cycle of 189 short didactic discourses of Bishop Irenei (Falkovsky), delivered in the Kyiv-Mikhailivka Golden-Domed Monastery and devoted to the theme of God’s endless after-death retributions (“on eternal punishments”). Based on the manuscript files of the Institute of Manuscripts of the National Library of Ukraine (f. 312: files 198, 201, 202, 205, 206, 208), the genesis of the corpus (from early unnumbered entries to later ordered editions), its internal evolution and compositional model are traced. It is shown that according to the author’s self-identification these are “short didactic discourses”, however, the actual form stabilizes as a “large” structure with a clear rhetorical algorithm: the biblical text as an index of the topic; a logical “approach”, which outlines the boundaries of consideration and addressability; exegetical analysis with patristic and intertextual parallels; doctrinal formulation; parenetic (moral-practical) conclusion. Three introductory conversations set the subject, ethical prerequisites of hearing (forgiveness, true fasting) and motivational imperative (\u201cpreach to all creation\u2026\u201d), included in a broad eschatological horizon. In the middle part of the cycle, a transition to ad hoc polemics with the \u201cnew Origenists\u201d is recorded: the universalist hope for a \u201cgeneral restoration\u201d is systematically refuted, a fundamental distinction is made between the \u201ccessation of the effectiveness of evil\u201d in the created order and the \u201ccancellation of judgment\u201d, the scope of the promises of Revelation is clarified. 2. Representative examples are conversations 109\u2013110, where the author combines a subtle semantic correction of the arguments of his opponents (1 Cor. 15:24, 28; Rev. 21:4; Ex. 34:6\u20137) with pastoral moral teaching. Particular attention is paid to conversation 147, which testifies to the local addressee of the polemic (\u201cclose acquaintances\u201d, \u201cfellow citizens\u201d) and demonstrates how logical analysis turns into a warning against the \u201csweet delusion\u201d of impunity, which dulls the fear of God and demoralizes the will. The manuscript material allows us to record the consistent deepening of exegesis, the alignment of compositional periods, and the growth of patristic citation in the later editions (1821\u20131823), as well as the author\u2019s editing practice, which transforms the cycle into a long-term pastoral and educational project. The novelty of the study lies in the reconstruction of a holistic theological and rhetorical model of a \u201cdecade-long sermon,\u201d the clarification of the number and boundaries of the corpus (189 units with three introductions), the identification of stable methods of argumentation, and the delineation of its place in the history of Ukrainian Orthodox homiletics as a long-term \u201ceschatological catechesis.\u201d The practical significance lies in the fact that the reconstructed compositional discipline, the principle of working with \u201cdifficult passages\u201d of Scripture, and the combination of dogmatic clarity with pastoral address can serve as a methodological model for modern preaching practice. The theoretical contribution lies in filling the source database, unifying the description of manuscripts, proposing parameters for a critical edition, and clarifying the confessional context of the polemics at the beginning of the 19th century.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Key words:<\/strong> Bishop Irinej (Falkovsky), St. Michael’s Golden-Domed Monastery, sermon, homiletics, rhetoric, exegesis, patristics, polemic.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

References:<\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. \n
      <\/ol>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
        \n
      1. \n
          \n
        1. IR NBUV Spr. 198. (1808\u20131809). Kratkie pouchitel’nye besedy k narodu, na vse voskresnye, prazdnichnye i vysokotorzhestvennye dni goda, s kratkim ob#jasneniem chitaemyh vo onye dni evangelij, sochinennye i govorennye v pervoklassnom Kievskom Zlatoverho-Mihajlovskom monastyre vo vremja arhierejskih svjashhennosluzhenij, nastojatelem onogo monastyrja, Irineem, vikariem mitropolii Kievskija, episkopom Chigirinskim. Kiev [in Russian].<\/li>\n
        2. IR NBUV Spr. 201. (1810). Kratkie pouchitel’nye Besedy k narodu o beskonechnosti imejushhih byt’ po smerti pravednyh Bozhiih vozdajanij kazhdomu po delam s oproverzheniem pagubnogo v sem dogmate zabluzhdenija novejshih origenian, sochinennye i vo vremja svjashhennosluzhenij arhierejskih v techenii goda, v pervoklassnom Kievskom Zlatoverho-Mihajlovskom monastyre iskusno govorennye, nastojatelem onago monastyrja, Irineem vikariem Mitropolii Kievskija, episkopom Chigirinskim (besedy 1\u201364). Kiev [in Russian].<\/li>\n
        3. IR NBUV Spr. 202. (1810). Prodolzhenie kratkih pouchitel’nyh Besed k narodu o beskonechnosti imejushhih byt’ po smerti pravednyh Bozhiih vozdajanij kazhdomu po delam s oproverzheniem pagubnogo v sem dogmate zabluzhdenija novejshih origenian, sochinennye i vo vremja svjashhennosluzhenij arhierejskih v techenii goda, v pervoklassnom Kievskom Zlatoverho-Mihajlovskom monastyre iskusno govorennye, nastojatelem onago monastyrja, Irineem vikariem Mitropolii Kievskija, episkopom Chigirinskim (besedy 65\u2013108). Kiev [in Russian].<\/li>\n
        4. IR NBUV Spr. 205. (1819). Prodolzhenie kratkih pouchitel’nyh Besed k narodu o beskonechnosti imejushhih byt’ po smerti pravednyh Bozhiih vozdajanij kazhdomu po delam s oproverzheniem pagubnogo v sem dogmate zabluzhdenija novejshih origenian, sochinennye i vo vremja svjashhennosluzhenij arhierejskih v techenii goda, v pervoklassnom Kievskom Zlatoverho-Mihajlovskom monastyre iskusno govorennye, nastojatelem onogo monastyrja, Irineem vikariem Mitropolii Kievskija, episkopom Chigirinskim (besedy 109\u2013145). Kiev [in Russian].<\/li>\n
        5. IR NBUV Spr. 206. (1812). Prodolzhenie kratkih pouchitel’nyh Besed k narodu o beskonechnosti imejushhih byt’ po smerti pravednyh Bozhiih vozdajanij kazhdomu po delam s oproverzheniem pagubnogo v sem dogmate zabluzhdenija novejshih origenian, sochinennye i vo vremja svjashhennosluzhenij arhierejskih v techenii goda, v pervoklassnom Kievskom Zlatoverho-Mihajlovskom monastyre iskusno govorennye, nastojatelem onogo monastyrja, Irineem vikariem Mitropolii Kievskija, episkopom Chigirinskim (besedy 146\u2013183). Jaroslavl’ [in Russian].<\/li>\n
        6. IR NBUV Spr. 208. (1822\u20131823). Prodolzhenie kratkih pouchitel’nyh Besed k narodu o beskonechnosti imejushhih byt’ po smerti pravednyh Bozhiih vozdajanij kazhdomu po delam s oproverzheniem pagubnogo v sem dogmate zabluzhdenija novejshih origenian, sochinennye i vo vremja svjashhennosluzhenij arhierejskih v techenii goda, v pervoklassnom Kievskom Zlatoverho-Mihajlovskom monastyre iskusno govorennye, nastojatelem onogo monastyrja, Irineem vikariem Mitropolii Kievskija, episkopom Chigirinskim (besedy 146\u2013148). Kiev [in Russian].<\/li>\n
        7. Aliesieienko M. V. (2023). Vydannia prats H. S. Skovorody u naukovii bibliotetsi Odeskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni I. I. Mechnykova: liudy ta knyzhky. Materialy 79-zvitnoi naukovoi konferentsii profersko-vykladatskoho skladu i naukovykh pratsivnykiv.<\/li>\n
        8. Bulashev G. (1883). Preosvjashhennyj Irinej Fal’kovskij, koadjutor kievskij. Kievskaja starina [in Russian].<\/li>\n
        9. Dymytrii (Rudiuk), mytr., Klos V., prot. (2013). Kyievo-Mykhailivskyi Zolotoverkhyi monastyr. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].<\/li>\n
        10. Zatyliuk Ya. V. Obraz kniazia Volodymyra u propovidiakh Iryneia Falkovskoho [elektronnyi resurs] \/ Yaroslav Zatyliuk \/\/ “Ad Fontes – Do Dzherel”: Mizhnarodna naukova konferentsiia z nahody 405-yi richnytsi zasnuvannia Kyievo-Mohylianskoi akademii \/ Natsionalnyi universytet “Kyievo-Mohylianska akademiia”. URL: https:\/\/youtu.be\/7u2InqJMvpg. (Data perehliadu: 28.09.2025).<\/li>\n
        11. Klos V., sviashch. (2007). Istoriia Mykhailivskoho Zolotoverkhoho monastyria. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].<\/li>\n
        12. Klos V., prot. (2021). Svitochi blahochestia Kyievo-Mykhailivskoho Zolotoverkhoho monastyria. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].<\/li>\n
        13. Minakov A. Ju. (2011). Russkij konservatizm v pervoj chetverti XIX veka: monografija. [in Russian].<\/li>\n
        14. Pavlovskij I. (1880). Neskol’ko slov ob Irinee Fal’kovskom. Poltavskie eparhial’nye vedomosti [in Russian].<\/li>\n
        15. Petrov N. I. (1904). Opisanie rukopisnyh sobranij, nahodjashhihsja v gorode Kieve. Moskva, Vyp. 3: Biblioteka Kievo-Sofijskogo sobora [in Russian].<\/li>\n
        16. Solovii R. (2016). Fenomen Vynykaiuchoi tserkvy u konteksti teolohichnykh ta ekleziolohichnykh transformatsii u suchasnomu zakhidnomu protestantyzmi. Kyiv: Dukh i litera. [in Ukrainian].<\/li>\n
        17. Strizhev A. N. (2014). Aleksandr Fjodorovich Labzin (1766\u20131825). Materialy k bibliografii. Literaturovedcheskij zhurnal [in Russian].<\/li>\n
        18. Trofymuk M. M. (2013). Klasyfikatsiia propovidnytskykh zhanriv u literaturnii spadshchyni Iryneia Falkovskoho. Naukovyi visnyk Chernivetskoho universytetu: zb. nauk. prats. Romano-slovianskyi dyskurs [in Ukrainian].<\/li>\n
        19. Trofymuk M. M. (2019). Tvorchist Iryneia Falkovskoho u konteksti ukrainskoi literatury kintsia XVIII \u2013 pochatku KhIKh stolittia : dys. \u2026 kandydata filolohichnykh nauk: 10.01.01. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].<\/li>\n
        20. Feopemt Misailov (1806). O dejstvovanii. Sionskij vestnik. [in Russian].<\/li>\n
        21. Shhogolev N. (1868). Preosvjashhennago Irineja (Fal’kovskogo) episkopa chigirinskogo\u2026besedy na den’ obrezanija gospodnja i na novyj 1811 god. Trudy Kievskoj duhovnoj akademii [in Russian].<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

          <\/p>\n

          <\/p>\n

          \n

          <\/p>\n

          \u00a0<\/p>\n

          <\/p>\n<\/div>\n

          <\/p>\n

          <\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

          \n\t\t\t\t
          \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
          \n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tView\/download PDF <\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

          Number DOI: http:\/\/doi.org\/10.33209\/2519-4348-2707-9627-2025-13-175 Volynskyi Blahovisnyk. \u2116 13. 2025. P. 169-184. Summary The article is devoted to the study of a cycle of 189 short didactic discourses of Bishop Irenei (Falkovsky), delivered in the Kyiv-Mikhailivka Golden-Domed Monastery and devoted to the theme of God’s endless after-death retributions (“on eternal punishments”). Based on the manuscript files of the Institute of Manuscripts of the National Library of Ukraine (f. 312: files 198, 201, 202, 205, 206, 208), the genesis of the corpus (from early unnumbered entries to later ordered editions), its internal evolution and compositional model are traced. It is shown that according to the author’s self-identification these are “short didactic discourses”, however, the actual form stabilizes as a “large” structure with a clear rhetorical algorithm: the biblical text as an index of the topic; a logical “approach”, which outlines the boundaries of consideration and addressability; exegetical analysis with patristic and intertextual parallels; doctrinal formulation; parenetic (moral-practical) conclusion. Three introductory conversations set the subject, ethical prerequisites of hearing (forgiveness, true fasting) and motivational imperative (\u201cpreach to all creation\u2026\u201d), included in a broad eschatological horizon. In the middle part of the cycle, a transition to ad hoc polemics with the \u201cnew Origenists\u201d is recorded: the universalist hope for a \u201cgeneral restoration\u201d is systematically refuted, a fundamental distinction is made between the \u201ccessation of the effectiveness of evil\u201d in the created order and the \u201ccancellation of judgment\u201d, the scope of the promises of Revelation is clarified. 2. Representative examples are conversations 109\u2013110, where the author combines a subtle semantic correction of the arguments of his opponents (1 Cor. 15:24, 28; Rev. 21:4; Ex. 34:6\u20137) with pastoral moral teaching. Particular attention is paid to conversation 147, which testifies to the local addressee of the polemic (\u201cclose acquaintances\u201d, \u201cfellow citizens\u201d) and demonstrates how logical analysis turns into a warning against the \u201csweet delusion\u201d of impunity, which dulls the fear of God and demoralizes the will. The manuscript material allows us to record the consistent deepening of exegesis, the alignment of compositional periods, and the growth of patristic citation in the later editions (1821\u20131823), as well as the author\u2019s editing practice, which transforms the cycle into a long-term pastoral and educational project. The novelty of the study lies in the reconstruction of a holistic theological and rhetorical model of a \u201cdecade-long sermon,\u201d the clarification of the number and boundaries of the corpus (189 units with three introductions), the identification of stable methods of argumentation, and the delineation of its place in the history of Ukrainian Orthodox homiletics as a long-term \u201ceschatological catechesis.\u201d The practical significance lies in the fact that the reconstructed compositional discipline, the principle of working with \u201cdifficult passages\u201d of Scripture, and the combination of dogmatic clarity with pastoral address can serve as a methodological model for modern preaching practice. The theoretical contribution lies in filling the source database, unifying the description of manuscripts, proposing parameters for a critical edition, and clarifying the confessional context of the polemics at the beginning of the 19th century. Key words: Bishop Irinej (Falkovsky), St. Michael’s Golden-Domed Monastery, sermon, homiletics, rhetoric, exegesis, patristics, polemic. References: IR NBUV Spr. 198. (1808\u20131809). Kratkie pouchitel’nye besedy k narodu, na vse voskresnye, prazdnichnye i vysokotorzhestvennye dni goda, s kratkim ob#jasneniem chitaemyh vo onye dni evangelij, sochinennye i govorennye v pervoklassnom Kievskom Zlatoverho-Mihajlovskom monastyre vo vremja arhierejskih svjashhennosluzhenij, nastojatelem onogo monastyrja, Irineem, vikariem mitropolii Kievskija, episkopom Chigirinskim. Kiev [in Russian]. IR NBUV Spr. 201. (1810). Kratkie pouchitel’nye Besedy k narodu o beskonechnosti imejushhih byt’ po smerti pravednyh Bozhiih vozdajanij kazhdomu po delam s oproverzheniem pagubnogo v sem dogmate zabluzhdenija novejshih origenian, sochinennye i vo vremja svjashhennosluzhenij arhierejskih v techenii goda, v pervoklassnom Kievskom Zlatoverho-Mihajlovskom monastyre iskusno govorennye, nastojatelem onago monastyrja, Irineem vikariem Mitropolii Kievskija, episkopom Chigirinskim (besedy 1\u201364). Kiev [in Russian]. IR NBUV Spr. 202. (1810). Prodolzhenie kratkih pouchitel’nyh Besed k narodu o beskonechnosti imejushhih byt’ po smerti pravednyh Bozhiih vozdajanij kazhdomu po delam s oproverzheniem pagubnogo v sem dogmate zabluzhdenija novejshih origenian, sochinennye i vo vremja svjashhennosluzhenij arhierejskih v techenii goda, v pervoklassnom Kievskom Zlatoverho-Mihajlovskom monastyre iskusno govorennye, nastojatelem onago monastyrja, Irineem vikariem Mitropolii Kievskija, episkopom Chigirinskim (besedy 65\u2013108). Kiev [in Russian]. IR NBUV Spr. 205. (1819). Prodolzhenie kratkih pouchitel’nyh Besed k narodu o beskonechnosti imejushhih byt’ po smerti pravednyh Bozhiih vozdajanij kazhdomu po delam s oproverzheniem pagubnogo v sem dogmate zabluzhdenija novejshih origenian, sochinennye i vo vremja svjashhennosluzhenij arhierejskih v techenii goda, v pervoklassnom Kievskom Zlatoverho-Mihajlovskom monastyre iskusno govorennye, nastojatelem onogo monastyrja, Irineem vikariem Mitropolii Kievskija, episkopom Chigirinskim (besedy 109\u2013145). Kiev [in Russian]. IR NBUV Spr. 206. (1812). Prodolzhenie kratkih pouchitel’nyh Besed k narodu o beskonechnosti imejushhih byt’ po smerti pravednyh Bozhiih vozdajanij kazhdomu po delam s oproverzheniem pagubnogo v sem dogmate zabluzhdenija novejshih origenian, sochinennye i vo vremja svjashhennosluzhenij arhierejskih v techenii goda, v pervoklassnom Kievskom Zlatoverho-Mihajlovskom monastyre iskusno govorennye, nastojatelem onogo monastyrja, Irineem vikariem Mitropolii Kievskija, episkopom Chigirinskim (besedy 146\u2013183). Jaroslavl’ [in Russian]. IR NBUV Spr. 208. (1822\u20131823). Prodolzhenie kratkih pouchitel’nyh Besed k narodu o beskonechnosti imejushhih byt’ po smerti pravednyh Bozhiih vozdajanij kazhdomu po delam s oproverzheniem pagubnogo v sem dogmate zabluzhdenija novejshih origenian, sochinennye i vo vremja svjashhennosluzhenij arhierejskih v techenii goda, v pervoklassnom Kievskom Zlatoverho-Mihajlovskom monastyre iskusno govorennye, nastojatelem onogo monastyrja, Irineem vikariem Mitropolii Kievskija, episkopom Chigirinskim (besedy 146\u2013148). Kiev [in Russian]. Aliesieienko M. V. (2023). Vydannia prats H. S. Skovorody u naukovii bibliotetsi Odeskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni I. I. Mechnykova: liudy ta knyzhky. Materialy 79-zvitnoi naukovoi konferentsii profersko-vykladatskoho skladu i naukovykh pratsivnykiv. Bulashev G. (1883). Preosvjashhennyj Irinej Fal’kovskij, koadjutor kievskij. Kievskaja starina [in Russian]. Dymytrii (Rudiuk), mytr., Klos V., prot. (2013). Kyievo-Mykhailivskyi Zolotoverkhyi monastyr. Kyiv [in Ukrainian]. Zatyliuk Ya. V. Obraz kniazia Volodymyra u propovidiakh Iryneia Falkovskoho [elektronnyi resurs] \/ Yaroslav Zatyliuk \/\/ “Ad Fontes – Do Dzherel”: Mizhnarodna naukova konferentsiia z nahody 405-yi richnytsi zasnuvannia Kyievo-Mohylianskoi akademii \/ Natsionalnyi universytet “Kyievo-Mohylianska akademiia”. URL: https:\/\/youtu.be\/7u2InqJMvpg. (Data perehliadu: 28.09.2025). Klos V., sviashch. (2007). Istoriia Mykhailivskoho Zolotoverkhoho monastyria. Kyiv [in Ukrainian]. Klos V., prot. (2021). Svitochi blahochestia Kyievo-Mykhailivskoho Zolotoverkhoho monastyria. Kyiv [in Ukrainian]. Minakov A. Ju. (2011). Russkij […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[349],"tags":[376],"class_list":["post-6420","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category--13-2025","tag-bishop-anthony-firlei","post-no-thumbnail"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/vb.vpba.edu.ua\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6420","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/vb.vpba.edu.ua\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/vb.vpba.edu.ua\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vb.vpba.edu.ua\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vb.vpba.edu.ua\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6420"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/vb.vpba.edu.ua\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6420\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6547,"href":"https:\/\/vb.vpba.edu.ua\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6420\/revisions\/6547"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/vb.vpba.edu.ua\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6420"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vb.vpba.edu.ua\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6420"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vb.vpba.edu.ua\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6420"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}