{"id":4484,"date":"2024-12-12T16:18:02","date_gmt":"2024-12-12T14:18:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/vb.vpba.edu.ua\/?p=4484"},"modified":"2025-02-13T11:36:12","modified_gmt":"2025-02-13T09:36:12","slug":"philosophy-as-a-mentor-on-the-way-to-theology-in-the-treatise-of-s-boethius-consolation-of-philosophy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/vb.vpba.edu.ua\/uk\/philosophy-as-a-mentor-on-the-way-to-theology-in-the-treatise-of-s-boethius-consolation-of-philosophy\/","title":{"rendered":"\u0424\u0456\u043b\u043e\u0441\u043e\u0444\u0456\u044f \u044f\u043a \u043d\u0430\u0441\u0442\u0430\u0432\u043d\u0438\u0446\u044f \u043d\u0430 \u0448\u043b\u044f\u0445 \u0434\u043e \u0442\u0435\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0433\u0456\u0457 \u0443 \u0442\u0440\u0430\u043a\u0442\u0430\u0442\u0456 \u0421. \u0411\u043e\u0435\u0446\u0456\u044f \u00ab\u0420\u043e\u0437\u0440\u0430\u0434\u0430 \u0432\u0456\u0434 \u0444\u0456\u043b\u043e\u0441\u043e\u0444\u0456\u0457\u00bb"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\n
Viktor Petrushenko<\/summary>\n

Doctor of Philosophy, Professor, Invited Professor, Lviv Orthodox Theological Academy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

vipetfil@gmail.com | ORCID: 0000-0002-0848-9440<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Number DOI: http:\/\/doi.org\/10.33209\/2519-4348-2707-9627-2024-12-163<\/p>\n\n\n\n

VB. – \u2116 12, 2024. – P. 231-249<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Summary<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

This study offers the author\u2019s version of the solution to the well-known riddle of S. Boethius\u2019 treatise “Consolation of Philosophy”: it is not clear why, at the eve of his execution, the author of the treatise does not demonstrate Christian piety and turns for consolation not to Christ, but to Philosophy. The article presents different versions of the answer to this question: from the opinion about the allegorical nature of the work to refusal for Boethius to belong to Christians. Based on a careful study of the stages through which Philosophy takes a suffering philosopher, as well as the therapeutic means it uses and the results it achieves, the author of the article concludes that this whole process organically fits into the understanding of the role of philosophy in bringing to Christian piety and exquisite theology: this interpretation of the role of philosophy is supported by a reference to the works of authoritative representatives of early Christian patristics. However, Boethius, as it is demonstrated in the article, does not simply join such a position, but details it, using the ideas of late antique philosophy regarding the therapeutic role of philosophy for the soul, but in a different worldview and ideological context. In the opinion of the author of the article, the proposed reading of this treatise by Boethius is capable of enriching our ideas both about the relationship between theology and philosophy in early Christianity, and about the work of Boethius himself. The article uses the methods of textual analysis, comparative studies, and hermeneutics. The article is based on the analysis of numerous sources devoted to Boethius, both Ukrainian and, mostly, foreign ones. The author believes that the proposed reading version of Boethius’ treatise “Consolation of Philosophy” is quite organically consistent with his other theological treatises.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Key words: <\/strong>philosophy, theology, passions, variability of fate, therapy of the soul, good, attributes of God, life with God.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

References:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \n
  1. Anitsii Manlii Severyn Boetsii. Teolohichni traktaty (Theological treatises). \u0420erekl. z latyny y komentari Rostyslav Paranko. Lviv: Vydavnytstvo Ukrainskoho Katolytskoho Universytetu 2007. khii+148 s. [in Ukrainian].<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  2. Boetsii Severyn. Rozrada vid filosofii (Consolation \u043ef Philosophy). Per. z lat. A. Sodomora; Peredm. V. Kondzolka. K.: Vyd-vo Solomii Pavlychko \u00abOsnovy\u00bb, 2002. 146 s. [in Ukrainian].<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  3. Kulyk M. (2020). Teoriia piznannia Severyna Boetsiia: holovni kontseptsii ta sensy v konteksti serednovichnoi teolohii (The theory of knowledge of Severinus Boethius: main concepts and meanings in the context of medieval theology). Visnyk KhNU imeni V.N.Karazina. Seriia \u00abFilosofiia. Filosofski perypetii\u00bb (Bulletin of the V.N. Karazin KhNU. Series “Philosophy. Philosophical vicissitudes”). Vypusk 63. S. 109\u2013118 [in Ukrainian].<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  4. Popov V.Iu (2014). Trynitarna identolohiia traktatu Severyna Boetsiia \u00abLiber de Trinitate\u00bb (The Trinitarian Identology of Severinus Boethius\u2019 Liber de Trinitate). Filosofski obrii (Philosophical horizons). \u2116 31. S. 53 \u2013 62 [in Ukrainian].<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  5. Shamsha I.V. (2008). Rozuminnia buttia u filosofii Boetsiia (Understanding being in the philosophy of Boethius). Multiversum (Multiverse). 2008. \u211673. S. 203\u2013212 [in Ukrainian].<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  6. Arnobius of Sicca (1949). The case \u00abAgainst The Pagans\u00bb. Newly translated and annotated by George E. McCracken, PhD, F.A.A.R. Professor of Classics Drake University, Des Moines, Iova. Vol. One. Introdaction, book one \u2013 three. The Newman Press, Westminster, Maryland.  377 p. [in English].<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  7. Brian P. (2012). Copenhaver Dialectical Disputations, Volume 1: Book I (The I Tatti Renaissance Library) Hardcover \u2013 August 13, 2012. Lodi Nauta<\/a> (Translator). 448 p. Proem [in English].<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  8. Clemens Alessandrinus. Stromata. The stromata, or miscellanies. URL: http:\/\/www.ccel.org\/ccel\/schaff\/anf02.html<\/a> [in English]<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  9. Corpus scriptorum ecclesiasticorum latinorum. Editum consilio et impensis academiae literarum vindobonensis. Vol. LXVII. Anicii Manlii Severini Boethsii scriptorum partem IV: Philosophiae Consolacionis libros quinque. Resensvit. Guilelmus Weinberger. \u2013 Vindenbonae. Hoelder-Pichler-Tempsky A.G.; Lipsiae. Academische Verlags-Gesellschaft M.B.N., MCMXXXIV [in Latin]<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  10. Donato Antonio (2015). Boethius\u2019 Consolation of Philosophy as a Product of Late Antiquity. Bloomsbury Academic; Reprint edition (March 26, 2015) [in English] <\/li>\n\n\n\n
  11. Donato, Antonio (2013). Self-Examination and Consolation in Boethius` \u00abConsolation of Philosophy\u00bb. The Classical World. Vol. 106, No. 3 (SPRING), pp. 397 \u2013 430. URL: https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/24699933<\/a> [in English].<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  12. Fugikawa, Jason (2007 (2008)). The Self-Recovery of Boethius: Human Perfection in \u00abThe Consolation of Philosophy\u00bb. Carmina Philosophiae. Vol. 17, Special Issue: Part II: Selected Proceedings of the Franciscan University of Steubenville Graduate Program in Philosophy \u00abSecond Annual Conference on Christian Philosophy Boethius\u00bb Steubenville, Ohio, April 13\u201314, Pp. 81 \u2013 95. [in English].<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  13. Gilson, Etienne. (1987). Yistoria filozofii chrz\u015bcija\u0144skiej w wiekach \u015brednich. Institut wydawniczy PAX, Warszawa, 1987. 784 s. [in Poland].<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  14. Lewis C.S. (1964). The Discarded Image: An Introduction to Medieval and Renaissance Literature, 1964, Pp. 77 \u2013 78 [in English].  <\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n
      \n
    1. Marenbon John. (2003). Boethius. Oxford University Press. 252 \u0440. [in English].<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    2. Maurach, Gregor.<\/strong> (1976).<\/strong> <\/strong>Boethius interpretationen Von Gregor Maurach. R\u04e7mische Philosophie. Verlag: Darmstadt Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1976. ISBN 10: 3534043537ISBN 13: 9783534043538<\/a>. 425 s. [in Germany].<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    3. Papahagi, Adrian. (2010). Boethiana mediaevalia. Pp. 37\u201372. URL: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7761\/9789731997903_2<\/a> [in English].  <\/li>\n\n\n\n
    4. Reis E (1981). The fall of Boethius and the fiction of The Consolatione of Philosophy CJ, 1981. Pp. 37 \u2013 47 [in English].<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n
        \n
      1. Samuel Fox. (1999). Preface. King Alfred\u2019s Anglo-Saxon Version of Boethius\u2019 Consolation \u043ef Philosophy translated by Samuel Fox. In parentheses Publication Old English Series Cambridge Ontario. 125 p. [in English].<\/li>\n\n\n\n
      2. Shanzer, Danuta (1984). The Death of Boethius and the \u00abConsolation of Philosophy\u00bb \/\/ Hermes, 112. Bd., H. 3 (3rd Qtr., 1984), pp. 352-366. URL: https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/4476386<\/a> [in English].<\/li>\n\n\n\n
      3. Silk E. (1939). Boethius\u2019es Consolatio Philosophiae as a sequel to Augustine\u2019s Dialogues and Soliloquia. Harvard Theol. Rev. Vol. 32, p. 19-39 [in English].<\/li>\n\n\n\n
      4. St. Augustine. Against the academics (1950). Translated and annotated by JOHN J. O’MEARA, M. A., D.Phil, (OXON), Professor of Latin at University College Dublin, Ireland. The Newman Press, Westminster, Maryland, 1950 \/\/ 281.1 A54 v. 12 54-58543 Ancient Christian writers; the works of the Fathers in translation. URL: https:\/\/archive.org\/stream\/ancientchristian027820mbp \/ancientchristian027820mbp_djvu.txt<\/a>. [in English].<\/li>\n\n\n\n
      5. The Consolation of Philosophy by Anicius Manlius Severinus Boethius as translated by Geoffrey Chauser and rendered into modern English by Tom Powers. URL: Boethius-rendered-into-modern-English-by-Tom-Powers.pdf [in English].<\/li>\n\n\n\n
      6. Theophilus of Antioch to Autolycus, I, 2. URL: https:\/\/www.newadvent.org\/fathers\/02041.htm<\/a> [in English].<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n
        \n
        View\/download PDF<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

        <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

        Number DOI: http:\/\/doi.org\/10.33209\/2519-4348-2707-9627-2024-12-163 VB. – \u2116 12, 2024. – P. 231-249 Summary This study offers the author\u2019s version of the solution to the well-known riddle of S. Boethius\u2019 treatise “Consolation of Philosophy”: it is not clear why, at the eve of his execution, the author of the treatise does not demonstrate Christian piety and turns for consolation not to Christ, but to Philosophy. The article presents different versions of the answer to this question: from the opinion about the allegorical nature of the work to refusal for Boethius to belong to Christians. Based on a careful study of the stages through which Philosophy takes a suffering philosopher, as well as the therapeutic means it uses and the results it achieves, the author of the article concludes that this whole process organically fits into the understanding of the role of philosophy in bringing to Christian piety and exquisite theology: this interpretation of the role of philosophy is supported by a reference to the works of authoritative representatives of early Christian patristics. However, Boethius, as it is demonstrated in the article, does not simply join such a position, but details it, using the ideas of late antique philosophy regarding the therapeutic role of philosophy for the soul, but in a different worldview and ideological context. In the opinion of the author of the article, the proposed reading of this treatise by Boethius is capable of enriching our ideas both about the relationship between theology and philosophy in early Christianity, and about the work of Boethius himself. The article uses the methods of textual analysis, comparative studies, and hermeneutics. The article is based on the analysis of numerous sources devoted to Boethius, both Ukrainian and, mostly, foreign ones. The author believes that the proposed reading version of Boethius’ treatise “Consolation of Philosophy” is quite organically consistent with his other theological treatises. Key words: philosophy, theology, passions, variability of fate, therapy of the soul, good, attributes of God, life with God. References:<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[319],"tags":[252],"class_list":["post-4484","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category--12-2024","tag-viktor-petrushenko","post-no-thumbnail"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/vb.vpba.edu.ua\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4484","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/vb.vpba.edu.ua\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/vb.vpba.edu.ua\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vb.vpba.edu.ua\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vb.vpba.edu.ua\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4484"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/vb.vpba.edu.ua\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4484\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5685,"href":"https:\/\/vb.vpba.edu.ua\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4484\/revisions\/5685"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/vb.vpba.edu.ua\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4484"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vb.vpba.edu.ua\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4484"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vb.vpba.edu.ua\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4484"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}