{"id":4297,"date":"2024-12-12T13:04:26","date_gmt":"2024-12-12T11:04:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/vb.vpba.edu.ua\/?p=4297"},"modified":"2025-02-13T11:20:26","modified_gmt":"2025-02-13T09:20:26","slug":"greek-fathers-interpretations-of-templum-dei-as-a-double-theological-metaphor-3rd-9th-centuries","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/vb.vpba.edu.ua\/uk\/greek-fathers-interpretations-of-templum-dei-as-a-double-theological-metaphor-3rd-9th-centuries\/","title":{"rendered":"Greek Fathers\u2019 interpretations of templum Dei as a double theological metaphor (3rd-9th centuries)"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\u0425\u043e\u0441\u0435 \u041c\u0430\u0440\u0456\u044f \u0421\u0430\u043b\u044c\u0432\u0430\u0434\u043e\u0440-\u0413\u043e\u043d\u0441\u0430\u043b\u0435\u0441<\/summary>\n

\u0414\u043e\u043a\u0442\u043e\u0440 \u043c\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0435\u0446\u0442\u0432\u043e\u0437\u043d\u0430\u0432\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0430, \u0434\u043e\u043a\u0442\u043e\u0440 \u0440\u0435\u043b\u0456\u0433\u0456\u0454\u0437\u043d\u0430\u0432\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0430, \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0444\u0435\u0441\u043e\u0440 \u041c\u0430\u0434\u0440\u0438\u0434\u0441\u044c\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0443\u043d\u0456\u0432\u0435\u0440\u0441\u0438\u0442\u0435\u0442\u0443 \u041a\u043e\u043c\u043f\u043b\u0443\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0441\u0435 (\u041c\u0430\u0434\u0440\u0438\u0434, \u0406\u0441\u043f\u0430\u043d\u0456\u044f).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

jmsalvad@ucm.es | ORCID: 0000-0001-6854-8652<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u041d\u043e\u043c\u0435\u0440 DOI: http:\/\/doi.org\/10.33209\/2519-4348-2707-9627-2020-8-77<\/p>\n\n\n\n

VB. \u2013 \u2116 8, 2020. \u2013 \u0421. 127-145.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u0410\u043d\u043e\u0442\u0430\u0446\u0456\u044f<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The current article aims to highlight the symptomatic interpretations that, from the 3rd to the 9th century, many Greek-Eastern Fathers brought on some metaphorical expressions, such as (templum Dei)\u201d, \u201csanctuary,\u201d \u201ctabernacle\u201d (tabernaculum), \u201cabode of the Deity\u201d (domicilium Deitatis), and other similar terms referring to spaces or containers reserved exclusively for God. It should be pointed out that such metaphorical expressions come from different passages of the Old Testament, which were subsequently interpreted by the Fathers and theologians according to meanings consistent with the new faith founded by Christ. To carry out this research, the author of this paper proceeds following three methodological steps: first of all, finding \u2013through in-depth, accurate analysis on Greek-Eastern primary sources\u2014 some eloquent passages by many relevant masters of Christian doctrine on that issue; second, analyzing intratextual each passage to discover the doctrinal interpretation offered by each Greek-Eastern Christian writer about those metaphors; third, contrasting all these texts and authors intertextually through a comparative analysis to highlight their possible concordances or discrepancies. The study of the exegetic comments produced during those seven centuries by numerous Fathers of the Greek-Eastern Church allows discovering three interpretative variants: one strictly Mariological, another one exclusively Christological, and a third bivalent, simultaneously Mariological and Christological. It is also important to stress that this unanimity of interpretative criteria on metaphorical expressions above by the Greek-Eastern Fathers and theologians agrees with the similar exegetical coincidence of the Latin Fathers and theologians on the same metaphors, as we have explained in another article.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u041a\u043b\u044e\u0447\u043e\u0432\u0456 \u0441\u043b\u043e\u0432\u0430: <\/strong>Templum Dei; Christ\u2019s incarnation; virginal divine motherhood; Virgin Mary; Mariology; Christology; Greek-Eastern Patrology.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u041b\u0456\u0442\u0435\u0440\u0430\u0442\u0443\u0440\u0430:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

1.<\/strong>Primary Sources<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \n
  1. Alvarez Campos. S. (comp.). Corpus Marianum Patristicum<\/em> (Burgos, Aldecoa, 1970-1981), 7 vols.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  2. Andreas Cretensis, Encomium in Nativitatem sanctissimae Deiparae. Oratio I.<\/em> PG 97, 814.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  3. Andreas Cretensis, In Nativitatem B. Mariae. Oratio II.<\/em> PG 97, 834.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  4. Andreas Cretensis, Oratio IV. In sanctam Nativitatem praesanctae Dominae nostrae Dei Genitricis, semperque virginis Mariae<\/em>. PG 97, 867-875.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  5. Andreas Cretensis, Oratio V. In sanctissimae Deiparae Dominae nostrae Annuntiationem<\/em>. PG 97, 894-895. <\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

    6.Cyrillus Alexandrinus, Commentarius in S. Joannis Evangelium. Liber Quartus<\/em>, IV, 3. PG 73, 615.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    7.Cyrillus Alexandrinus, De adoratione in spiritu et veritate. Liber Nonus.<\/em> PG 68, 598. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

      \n
    1. Cyrillus Alexandrinus, De adoratione in spiritu et veritate. Liber Decimus.<\/em> PG 68, 670-671. <\/li>\n\n\n\n
    2. Cyrillus Alexandrinus,  In Malachiam 2<\/em>, 32. PG 72, 332.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    3. Cyrillus Alexandrinus, Commentarius in Lucam 1, 42.<\/em> PG 72, 754.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    4. Cyrillus Alexandrinus, Commentarius in S. Joannis Evangelium. <\/em>Liber Quartus<\/em>, 4, 3. PG 73, 602-615.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    5. Cyrillus Alexandrinus, Commentariorum in Joannem continuatio. Liber XI<\/em>, X. PG 74, 550.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    6. Cyrillus Alexandrinus, Thesaurus.<\/em> PG 75, 262.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    7. Cyrillus Alexandrinus, De incarnatione Domini 23.<\/em> PG 75, 1459-1462.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    8. Cyrillus Alexandrinus, Adversus eos qui audent Nestorii dogmatibus, ut rectis, patrocinari, Capita XII<\/em>, 1. PG 76, 394.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

      16.   Cyrillus Alexandrinus, De recta fide, ad Theodosium Imperatorem<\/em>. PG 76, 1142.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        \n
      1. Cyrillus Alexandrinus, Homilia Paschalis XV<\/em>, 3. PG 77, 739-742.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
      2. Cyrillus Alexandrinus, Homilia IV<\/em>. PG 77, 991.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

        19.   Cyrillus Alexandrinus, Homilia XI. Encomium in sanctam Mariam Deiparam<\/em>. PG 77, 1031.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          \n
        1. Ephraem Syrus, Hymni de Nativitate <\/em>17, 5. In S. Alvarez Campos, Corpus Marianum Patristicum<\/em> (Burgos, Aldecoa 1970), vol. II, 492.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

          21.   Ephraem Syrus, Carmina Sogita 1, <\/em>38 y 40. In Alvarez Campos, op.cit., 517. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

          22.   Eusebius Caesariensis, Eclogae propheticae<\/em>. Liber II<\/em>, 10. PG 22, 1105.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

            \n
          1. Germanus Constantinopolitanus, In Praesentationem SS. Deiparae. Sermo I<\/em>. PG 98, 294-306.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
          2. Germanus Constantinopolitanus, In praesentationem SS. Deiparae. Sermo II<\/em>. PG 98, 311.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
          3. Germanus Constantinopolitanus, In sanctissimae Dei Genitricis Annuntiationem<\/em>. PG 98, 322-330.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
          4. Germanus Constantinopolitanus, In Dormitionem B. Mariae. <\/em>Sermo II<\/em>. PG 98, 355.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
          5. Gregorius Nazianzenus, Poemata quae spectant ad alios<\/em>, 7. PG 37, 1.565-1.566.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
          6. Gregorius Nyssenus, In Christi Resurrectionem Oratio Prima<\/em>. PG 46, 615. <\/li>\n\n\n\n
          7. Hesychius Hierosolymitanus, Sermo V.<\/em> De sancta Maria Deipara Homilia<\/em>. PG 93, 1462.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
          8. Iohannes Damascenus, Homilia in Annuntiationem B.V. Mariae<\/em>. PG 96, 643.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
          9. Iohannes Damascenus, Homilia I In Nativitatem B.V. Mariae<\/em>, 9. PG 96, 675-678.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
          10. Iohannes Damascenus, Homilia II In Nativitatem B.V. Mariae<\/em>, 7. PG 96, 690.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
          11. Joannis Euboeensis, Sermo in Conceptionem Sanctae Deiparae<\/em>, XIV, PG 96, 1.482.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
          12. Josephus Hymnographus, Mariale. <\/em>I. In pervigilio Nativitatis SS. Deiparae Canon I<\/em>. PG 105, 983-986. <\/li>\n\n\n\n
          13. Josephus Hymnographus, Mariale. I. In profestivitate obdormitioni beatissimae Virginis Canon III<\/em>. PG 105, 999.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
          14. Josephus Hymnographus, Mariale. I. In sanctissimam Deiparam Canon VII<\/em>. PG 105, 1.027-1.030.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

            37.   Josephus Hymnographus, Mariale. Theotocia seu Deiparae Strophae<\/em>. PG 105, 1.063.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

            38.   Josephus Hymnographus, Mariale. The<\/em>otocia Ex Paracletica Graecorum<\/em>. PG 105, 1.258-1.383.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

              \n
            1. Leontius Byzantinus, Adversus Nestorianos. Liber IV<\/em>, 9. PG 86-1, 1.670.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
            2. Migne, J.-P., Patrologiae Cursus Completus, Series Graeca<\/em> (Paris, Garnier, 1857-1867), 166 vols. <\/li>\n\n\n\n
            3. Modestus Hierosolymitanus, Encomium in Dormitionem Sanctissimae Dominae Nostrae Deiparae semperque Virginis Mariae<\/em>. PG 86-2:, 3.285-3.302. <\/li>\n\n\n\n
            4. Origenes, In Exodum Homilia VI.<\/em> PG 12, 340.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
            5. Origenes, Homiliae in<\/em> Librum Iesu Nave. Homilia XVII<\/em>, 1. PG 12, 909-910.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

              44.   Pamphilus Hierosolymitanus, Panoplia dogmativa<\/em> 7, 3. In Alvarez Campos, Corpus Marianum Patristicum<\/em>, 1979, vol. IV\/2, 433.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

              45.   Proclus Constantinopolitanus, Oratio I. Laudatio in sanctissimam Dei genitricem Mariam<\/em>. PG 65, 679-691.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                \n
              1. Proclus Constantinopolitanus, Oratio III. De Incarnatione Domini nostri Jesu Christi<\/em>, 1. PG 65, 707. <\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

                47.   Proclus Constantinopolitanus, Oratio VI. Laudatio sanctae Dei genitricis Mariae<\/em>. PG 65, 754-755.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                  \n
                1. Procopius Gazensis, Commentarius in <\/em>Exodu<\/em>m<\/em>. PG 87-1, 635-636.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                2. Procopius Gazensis, In Exodum <\/em>25, 26, 1. PG 87-1, 645-646.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                3. Severianus Gabalensis, In Natalem Christi diem Oratio.<\/em> PG 56, 390.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                4. Severus Antiochenus, Hymnus <\/em>119<\/em>. In Alvarez Campos, Corpus Marianum Patristicum<\/em>, 1979, vol. IV\/2, 59. <\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

                  52.   Theodoretus Cyrensis, In Isaiam prol.<\/em> PG 81, 311.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                  Bibliography<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

                    \n
                  1. Aldama, J. A. de, Mar\u00eda en la Patr\u00edstica de los siglos I y II<\/em>, (Madrid, La Editorial Cat\u00f3lica, 1970), 2 vols.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                  2. Barbaglio, G., & Dianich, S. (dirs.), Nuevo Diccionario de Teolog\u00eda, vol.I. A. Testamento \u2013 Mariolog\u00eda<\/em> (Madrid, Editorial Cristiandad, 1982).<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                  3. Berardino, A. di (dir.), Dizionario Patristico e di Antichit\u00e0 Cristiane<\/em>, (Cassale Monferrato, Marietti, 1983), 2 vols.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                  4. Bourgeois, H., Sesbo\u00fc\u00e9, B. & Tihon, P. (dirs.), Historia de los dogmas. Tomo III: Los signos de la salvaci\u00f3n<\/em>, (Madrid, Secretariado Trinitario, 2010).<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

                    57.   Cabrol, F. & Leclercq, H. (eds.), Dictionnaire de Th\u00e9ologie Catholique<\/em>, (Paris, Librairie Letouzey et An\u00e9, 1927, Tome 9, 2e Partie).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                    58.   de Fiores, S. &  Meo. S. (dirs.), Nuevo Diccionario de Mariolog\u00eda<\/em>, (Madrid,  San Pablo Ediciones, 1988). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

                    59.   de Fiores,  S. &  Testa, E., \u201cMar\u00eda de Nazaret\u201d, in de Fiores, S. &  Meo. S. (dirs.), Nuevo Diccionario de Mariolog\u00eda<\/em>, 1.244-1.270. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

                    60.   de Fiores, S. & Serra, A.,  \u201cVirgen\u201d, in de Fiores, S. &  Meo. S. (dirs.), Nuevo Diccionario de Mariolog\u00eda<\/em>, 1.977-2.039.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                    61.   Dublanchy, E., \u201cMarie\u201d, in Cabrol, F. & Leclercq, H. (eds.), Dictionnaire de Th\u00e9ologie Catholique<\/em>, 1927, Tome 9, 2e Partie, col. 2.339-2.474.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                    62.   Galot, J. \u201cMaria\u201d, in Barbaglio, G. & Dianich, S. (dirs.), Nuevo Diccionario de Teolog\u00eda<\/em>, Vol. I, 968-984.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                    63.   Garc\u00eda Paredes, J. C. R., Mariolog\u00eda<\/em>, (Madrid, Biblioteca de Autores Cristianos, 2015).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                    64.   M\u00fcller, G. L., Dogm\u00e1tica. Teor\u00eda y pr\u00e1ctica de la teolog\u00eda<\/em>, (Barcelona, Herder. 1998). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

                    65.   M\u00fcller, G. L., \u201cLa madre de Cristo, modelo de la existencia cristiana y tipo de la Iglesia (Mariolog\u00eda)\u201d, in M\u00fcller, G. L., Dogm\u00e1tica. Teor\u00eda y pr\u00e1ctica de la teolog\u00eda<\/em>, 479-518. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

                      \n
                    1. Ponce Cu\u00e9llar,  M., Mar\u00eda, madre del Redentor y de la Iglesia<\/em> (Barcelona, Herder, 2001).<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                    2. Rahner, H., Mar\u00eda y la Iglesia<\/em>, (Madrid, Editorial Cristiandad, 2004). <\/li>\n\n\n\n
                    3. Salvador-Gonz\u00e1lez, J. M., \u201cLatin theological interpretations on templum Dei<\/em>: a double Christological and Mariological symbol (6th-15th centuries)\u201d (article under evaluation in an academic journal). <\/li>\n\n\n\n
                    4. Salvador-Gonz\u00e1lez, J. M., \u201cIconographic interpretation of the temple as a theological symbol in images of the Annunciation of the 14th and 15th centuries\u201d, Fenestella<\/em> 1 (2020) (in press).<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                    5. Serra, A., Meo, S. & Sartor, D., \u201cMadre de Dios\u201d, in de Fiores, S. &  Meo. S. (dirs.), Nuevo Diccionario de Mariolog\u00eda<\/em>, 1.173-1.199. <\/li>\n\n\n\n
                    6. Serra, A.,  Meo, S. & Sartor, D., \u201cMadre de Dios\u201d, en S. de Fiores \u2013  S. Meo (dirs.), Nuevo Diccionario de Mariolog\u00eda<\/em>,  1.173-1.199.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                    7. Sesbo\u00fc\u00e9, B., \u201cTercera Parte. La Virgen Mar\u00eda\u201d, in Bourgeois, H.. Sesbo\u00fc\u00e9, B. &  Tihon, P. (dirs.), Historia de los dogmas. Tomo III: Los signos de la salvaci\u00f3n<\/em>,  425-470. <\/li>\n\n\n\n
                    8. S\u00f6ll, G. I., \u201cMaria. I. Maria, madre di Ges\u00f9\u201d, in A. di Berardino (dir.), Dizionario Patristico e di Antichit\u00e0 Cristiane<\/em>, 1983, vol. II), 2.104-2.111. <\/li>\n\n\n\n
                    9. VV.VV., Enciclopedia Cattolica<\/em>, (Citt\u00e0 del Vaticano, Ente per l\u2019Enciclopedia Cattolica e per il Libro Cattolico, 1952, vol. VIII).<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

                      75.   VV.AA., \u201cMaria Santissima – Madre di Ges\u00f9 Cristo, Figlio di Dio fattosi uomo\u201d, in VV.VV., Enciclopedia Cattolica<\/em>, vol. VIII, col. 76-118.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                      \n
                      View\/download PDF<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

                      <\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                      Number DOI: http:\/\/doi.org\/10.33209\/2519-4348-2707-9627-2020-8-77 VB. – \u2116 8, 2020. – P. 127-145. Summary The current article aims to highlight the symptomatic interpretations that, from the 3rd to the 9th century, many Greek-Eastern Fathers brought on some metaphorical expressions, such as (templum Dei)\u201d, \u201csanctuary,\u201d \u201ctabernacle\u201d (tabernaculum), \u201cabode of the Deity\u201d (domicilium Deitatis), and other similar terms referring to spaces or containers reserved exclusively for God. It should be pointed out that such metaphorical expressions come from different passages of the Old Testament, which were subsequently interpreted by the Fathers and theologians according to meanings consistent with the new faith founded by Christ. To carry out this research, the author of this paper proceeds following three methodological steps: first of all, finding \u2013through in-depth, accurate analysis on Greek-Eastern primary sources\u2014 some eloquent passages by many relevant masters of Christian doctrine on that issue; second, analyzing intratextual each passage to discover the doctrinal interpretation offered by each Greek-Eastern Christian writer about those metaphors; third, contrasting all these texts and authors intertextually through a comparative analysis to highlight their possible concordances or discrepancies. The study of the exegetic comments produced during those seven centuries by numerous Fathers of the Greek-Eastern Church allows discovering three interpretative variants: one strictly Mariological, another one exclusively Christological, and a third bivalent, simultaneously Mariological and Christological. It is also important to stress that this unanimity of interpretative criteria on metaphorical expressions above by the Greek-Eastern Fathers and theologians agrees with the similar exegetical coincidence of the Latin Fathers and theologians on the same metaphors, as we have explained in another article. Key words: Templum Dei; Christ\u2019s incarnation; virginal divine motherhood; Virgin Mary; Mariology; Christology; Greek-Eastern Patrology. References: 1.Primary Sources 6.Cyrillus Alexandrinus, Commentarius in S. Joannis Evangelium. Liber Quartus, IV, 3. PG 73, 615. 7.Cyrillus Alexandrinus, De adoratione in spiritu et veritate. Liber Nonus. PG 68, 598.  16.   Cyrillus Alexandrinus, De recta fide, ad Theodosium Imperatorem. PG 76, 1142. 19.   Cyrillus Alexandrinus, Homilia XI. Encomium in sanctam Mariam Deiparam. PG 77, 1031. 21.   Ephraem Syrus, Carmina Sogita 1, 38 y 40. In Alvarez Campos, op.cit., 517.  22.   Eusebius Caesariensis, Eclogae propheticae. Liber II, 10. PG 22, 1105. 37.   Josephus Hymnographus, Mariale. Theotocia seu Deiparae Strophae. PG 105, 1.063. 38.   Josephus Hymnographus, Mariale. Theotocia Ex Paracletica Graecorum. PG 105, 1.258-1.383. 44.   Pamphilus Hierosolymitanus, Panoplia dogmativa 7, 3. In Alvarez Campos, Corpus Marianum Patristicum, 1979, vol. IV\/2, 433. 45.   Proclus Constantinopolitanus, Oratio I. Laudatio in sanctissimam Dei genitricem Mariam. PG 65, 679-691. 47.   Proclus Constantinopolitanus, Oratio VI. Laudatio sanctae Dei genitricis Mariae. PG 65, 754-755. 52.   Theodoretus Cyrensis, In Isaiam prol. PG 81, 311. Bibliography 57.   Cabrol, F. & Leclercq, H. (eds.), Dictionnaire de Th\u00e9ologie Catholique, (Paris, Librairie Letouzey et An\u00e9, 1927, Tome 9, 2e Partie). 58.   de Fiores, S. &  Meo. S. (dirs.), Nuevo Diccionario de Mariolog\u00eda, (Madrid,  San Pablo Ediciones, 1988).  59.   de Fiores,  S. &  Testa, E., \u201cMar\u00eda de Nazaret\u201d, in de Fiores, S. &  Meo. S. (dirs.), Nuevo Diccionario de Mariolog\u00eda, 1.244-1.270.  60.   de Fiores, S. & Serra, A.,  \u201cVirgen\u201d, in de Fiores, S. &  Meo. S. (dirs.), Nuevo Diccionario de Mariolog\u00eda, 1.977-2.039. 61.   Dublanchy, E., \u201cMarie\u201d, in Cabrol, F. & Leclercq, H. (eds.), Dictionnaire de Th\u00e9ologie Catholique, 1927, Tome 9, 2e Partie, col. 2.339-2.474. 62.   Galot, J. \u201cMaria\u201d, in Barbaglio, G. & Dianich, S. (dirs.), Nuevo Diccionario de Teolog\u00eda, Vol. I, 968-984. 63.   Garc\u00eda Paredes, J. C. R., Mariolog\u00eda, (Madrid, Biblioteca de Autores Cristianos, 2015). 64.   M\u00fcller, G. L., Dogm\u00e1tica. Teor\u00eda y pr\u00e1ctica de la teolog\u00eda, (Barcelona, Herder. 1998).  65.   M\u00fcller, G. L., \u201cLa madre de Cristo, modelo de la existencia cristiana y tipo de la Iglesia (Mariolog\u00eda)\u201d, in M\u00fcller, G. L., Dogm\u00e1tica. Teor\u00eda y pr\u00e1ctica de la teolog\u00eda, 479-518.  75.   VV.AA., \u201cMaria Santissima – Madre di Ges\u00f9 Cristo, Figlio di Dio fattosi uomo\u201d, in VV.VV., Enciclopedia Cattolica, vol. VIII, col. 76-118.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[87],"tags":[233],"class_list":["post-4297","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category--8-2020","tag-jose-maria-salvador-gonzalez","post-no-thumbnail"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/vb.vpba.edu.ua\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4297","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/vb.vpba.edu.ua\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/vb.vpba.edu.ua\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vb.vpba.edu.ua\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vb.vpba.edu.ua\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4297"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/vb.vpba.edu.ua\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4297\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5606,"href":"https:\/\/vb.vpba.edu.ua\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4297\/revisions\/5606"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/vb.vpba.edu.ua\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4297"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vb.vpba.edu.ua\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4297"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vb.vpba.edu.ua\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4297"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}