{"id":4229,"date":"2024-12-12T12:28:05","date_gmt":"2024-12-12T10:28:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/vb.vpba.edu.ua\/?p=4229"},"modified":"2025-02-13T11:10:34","modified_gmt":"2025-02-13T09:10:34","slug":"kiev-council-at-1628-as-an-example-of-judicial-power-of-the-metropolis-of-kiev-regional-council","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/vb.vpba.edu.ua\/uk\/kiev-council-at-1628-as-an-example-of-judicial-power-of-the-metropolis-of-kiev-regional-council\/","title":{"rendered":"\u0421\u0443\u0434\u043e\u0432\u0430 \u0432\u043b\u0430\u0434\u0430 \u043f\u043e\u043c\u0456\u0441\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0441\u043e\u0431\u043e\u0440\u0443 \u041a\u0438\u0457\u0432\u0441\u044c\u043a\u043e\u0457 \u043c\u0438\u0442\u0440\u043e\u043f\u043e\u043b\u0456\u0457 \u043d\u0430 \u043f\u0440\u0438\u043a\u043b\u0430\u0434\u0456 \u041a\u0438\u0457\u0432\u0441\u044c\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0441\u043e\u0431\u043e\u0440\u0443 1628 \u0440\u043e\u043a\u0443"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div class=\"wp-block-group\"><div class=\"wp-block-group__inner-container is-layout-constrained wp-block-group-is-layout-constrained\">\n<details class=\"wp-block-details is-layout-flow wp-block-details-is-layout-flow\"><summary>archpriest Volodymyr Vakin<\/summary>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">PhD, Associate Professor, Doctorant of KOTA rector of Volyn Orthodox Theological Academy<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">prot.v.vakin@vpba.edu.ua<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Number DOI: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.33209\/2519-4348-2018-6-119-132<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">VB. &#8211; \u2116 6, 2018. &#8211; P. 119-132<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Summary<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">At the beginning of the XVII century, to reestablish all repercussions of Uniate it was necessary to use all possible facilities to revive Metropolis of Kyiv. In the confrontation with the Roman-Catholic Church, not only the problems of administrative management and church rule were on the agenda, but religious issues were also important. In the 30&#8217;s of the XVII century an active and effective person in church life was the Archbishop of Polotsk Meletii (Smotrytsky). For a more in-depth study of the actual theological disputes of this period, he made a journey to the Ecumenical Patriarch and other Eastern priests of the ancient autocephalous churches. After returning home, Meletii (Smotrytsky), resorted to another extreme and began sincerely believe that all problems could be solved by joining the union with Rome. This position he described in his famous work, &#8220;Apology&#8221;, where, with the help of theological constructs, he argued the benefits of full subordination to the Roman throne. For the Metropolis of Kyiv, this position of the high hierarch has become a real challenge. Metropolitan of Kiev Yov (Borecky) was decided to convene a regional council of all bishops, monks, presbyters and influential laymen, to resolve the problem with a council vote. Thus, in the history of our Ukrainian Orthodox Church, a regional council was created that fully realized its judicial power in matters of dogmas and Orthodox doctrine. In addition to procedural justice and sentencing, we have also received an extremely interesting precedent &#8211; an accomplishment during the Liturgy of the &#8220;rank&#8221; of the anathematization of the convicted theological work with the personal participation of the author himself. The activity of the Kiev Council in 1628 reached its goal &#8211; the Metropolis of Kyiv was completely faithful to Orthodoxy in its entirety, but the personal fate of Meletii (Smotrytsky), initially led him to the unia and then to historical oblivion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Key words:&nbsp;<\/strong>Council, higher administration, St. Yov (Boretsky), Meletii (Smotrytsky), the church court, the Metropolis of Kyiv.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>References:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">1. Bulhakov Makaryi, mytr. Ystoryia Russkoi Tserkvy: V 9 t. \u2013 M.: Yzd. SpasoPreobrazhenskoho Valaamskoho monastyria, 1996. T. 6. \u2013 797 s.<br>2. Vlasovskyi I., prof. Narys istorii Ukrainskoi Pravoslavnoi Tserkvy: V 4 t. \u2013 K.: Vyd. UPTs Kyivskoho Patriarkhatu, 1998. T. 2. \u2013 396 s.<br>3. Vypyska Kievskaho hrodskaho suda pysma arkhiepyskopa Polotskaho y proch. Meletiia Smotrytskaho Kievskomu mytropolytu Iovu Boretskomu s opravdyvaniem\u044a sebia kasatelno svoykh sochynenii, za kotoryia obvynial eho Kievskii sobor. 1628, avhusta 30 \/\/ AIuyZR. \u2013 SPb.: v typohrafiy Eduarda Pratsa, 1865. T. II. \u2013 Akty, otnosiashchiesia k ystoriy v Yuzhnoi y Zapadnoi Rossiy. \u2013 272 s.<br>4. Knyha Pravyl Sviatykh Apostoliv, Vselenskykh i Pomisnykh Soboriv, i Sviatykh Ottsiv \/ Per. Chokaliuka S. M. \u2013 K.: Vyd. Presa Ukrainy, 2008. \u2013 367 s.<br>5. Lototskyi O., prof. Ukrainski dzherela tserkovnoho prava. \u2013 Varshava, 1931. \u2013 318 s.<br>6. Mykhailo Hrushevskyi. Istoriia ukrainskoi literatury. \u2013 K., 1995. \u2013 T. 6. \u2013 671 s.<br>7. Pysmo Meletiia Smotrytskaho k Volnskomu chashnyku Lavrentiiu Drevenskomu s yzvestiem o Kievskom\u044a sobore 1628 h. Y opravdaniiamy po povodu svoei yzmen\u044b pravoslaviiu \/\/ Holubev S. Kievskii mytropolyt Petr Mohyla y eho spodvyzhnyky. \u2013 K.: Typohrafiia H. T. Korchak-Novytskaho, Mykhailovskaia ul. Sobstv. dom, 1883. T. 1 \u2013 559(1) + 576(2).<br>8. Pysmo Meletiia Smotrytskaho k chlenam\u044a pravoslavnaho Vylenskaho bratstva \/\/ AIuZR. \u2013 K.: Typohrafiia H. T. Korsak-Novychkaho, Mykhailovskaia ulytsa, sobs. dom, 1883. T. VI. \u2013 Ch. I.: Akty o tserkovno-relyhioznykh otnosheniiakh v YuhshchZapadnoi Rusy. \u2013 938 s.<br>9. Pryhlashenie ot Mytpolyta Iova Boretskaho pravoslavnym zhyteliam Zapadnoi Rossiy pryslat svoykh vybornykh v Kiev k prazdnyku Uspeniia Bozhiei Matery, dlia soveshchaniia o delakh Pravoslavnoi Zapadno-Russkoi Tserkvy. 1628 h. Maia 26 \/\/ Arkheohrafycheskii sbornyk dokumentov otnosiashchykhsia k ystoriy Severozapadnoi Rusy yzdavaemyi pry upravleniy Vylynskaho uchebnaho okruha. \u2013 Vylna: Pechatnia Hubernskaho Pravleniia, 1867. \u2013 T. II. \u2013 258(1)+SI(2)+27(3).<br>10. Protestatsiia Meletiia Smotrytskaho protyv Kievskaho Sobora, byvshaho v avhuste 1628 \/\/ Holubev S. Kievskii mytropolyt\u044a Petr\u044a Mohyla y eho spodvyzhnyky. \u2013 K.: Typohrafiia H. T. Korchak-Novytskaho, Mykhailovskaia ul. Sobstv. dom, 1883. T. 1. \u2013 559(1) + 576(2).<br>11. Sas P. M. Kyivskyi pravoslavnyi tserkovnyi sobor 1628 \/\/ Entsyklopediia istorii Ukrainy: T. 4: Ka-Kom \/ Redkol.: V. A. Smolii (holova) ta in. NAN Ukrainy. Instytut istorii Ukrainy. \u2013 K.: V-vo &#8220;Naukova dumka&#8221;, 2007. \u2013 528 s.<br>12. Sovremennaia borshiura o Kievskom sobore, byvshem v avhuste 1628 h. \u0391\u03a0\u03a0\u039f\u039b\u039b\u0395\u0399\u0391 \/\/ Holubev S. Kievskii mytropolyt Petr Mohyla y eho spodvyzhnyky. \u2013 K. : Typohrafiia H. T. Korchak-Novytskaho, Mykhailovskaia ul. Sobstv. dom, 1883. T. 1. \u2013 559(1) + 576(2).<br>13. Statut pro upravlinnia Ukrainskoi Pravoslavnoi Tserkvy Kyivskoho Patriarkhatu. [Elektronnyi resurs]. \u2013 Rezhym dostupu: https:\/\/www.cerkva.info\/pages\/statut.<br>14. Meletiy Smotrzyskiy. Apologia peregrinatiey do Kraiow Wschodnych&#8230; \u2013 Lwow w Drukarni Jana Szeligi, Typographa, R. B., 1628. \u2013 204.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-buttons is-layout-flex wp-block-buttons-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-button\"><a class=\"wp-block-button__link wp-element-button\" href=\"https:\/\/vb.vpba.edu.ua\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2024\/12\/6_11.pdf\">View\/download PDF<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Number DOI: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.33209\/2519-4348-2018-6-119-132 VB. &#8211; \u2116 6, 2018. &#8211; P. 119-132 Summary At the beginning of the XVII century, to reestablish all repercussions of Uniate it was necessary to use all possible facilities to revive Metropolis of Kyiv. In the confrontation with the Roman-Catholic Church, not only the problems of administrative management and church rule were on the agenda, but religious issues were also important. In the 30&#8217;s of the XVII century an active and effective person in church life was the Archbishop of Polotsk Meletii (Smotrytsky). For a more in-depth study of the actual theological disputes of this period, he made a journey to the Ecumenical Patriarch and other Eastern priests of the ancient autocephalous churches. After returning home, Meletii (Smotrytsky), resorted to another extreme and began sincerely believe that all problems could be solved by joining the union with Rome. This position he described in his famous work, &#8220;Apology&#8221;, where, with the help of theological constructs, he argued the benefits of full subordination to the Roman throne. For the Metropolis of Kyiv, this position of the high hierarch has become a real challenge. Metropolitan of Kiev Yov (Borecky) was decided to convene a regional council of all bishops, monks, presbyters and influential laymen, to resolve the problem with a council vote. Thus, in the history of our Ukrainian Orthodox Church, a regional council was created that fully realized its judicial power in matters of dogmas and Orthodox doctrine. In addition to procedural justice and sentencing, we have also received an extremely interesting precedent &#8211; an accomplishment during the Liturgy of the &#8220;rank&#8221; of the anathematization of the convicted theological work with the personal participation of the author himself. The activity of the Kiev Council in 1628 reached its goal &#8211; the Metropolis of Kyiv was completely faithful to Orthodoxy in its entirety, but the personal fate of Meletii (Smotrytsky), initially led him to the unia and then to historical oblivion. Key words:&nbsp;Council, higher administration, St. Yov (Boretsky), Meletii (Smotrytsky), the church court, the Metropolis of Kyiv. References: 1. Bulhakov Makaryi, mytr. Ystoryia Russkoi Tserkvy: V 9 t. \u2013 M.: Yzd. SpasoPreobrazhenskoho Valaamskoho monastyria, 1996. T. 6. \u2013 797 s.2. Vlasovskyi I., prof. Narys istorii Ukrainskoi Pravoslavnoi Tserkvy: V 4 t. \u2013 K.: Vyd. UPTs Kyivskoho Patriarkhatu, 1998. T. 2. \u2013 396 s.3. Vypyska Kievskaho hrodskaho suda pysma arkhiepyskopa Polotskaho y proch. Meletiia Smotrytskaho Kievskomu mytropolytu Iovu Boretskomu s opravdyvaniem\u044a sebia kasatelno svoykh sochynenii, za kotoryia obvynial eho Kievskii sobor. 1628, avhusta 30 \/\/ AIuyZR. \u2013 SPb.: v typohrafiy Eduarda Pratsa, 1865. T. II. \u2013 Akty, otnosiashchiesia k ystoriy v Yuzhnoi y Zapadnoi Rossiy. \u2013 272 s.4. Knyha Pravyl Sviatykh Apostoliv, Vselenskykh i Pomisnykh Soboriv, i Sviatykh Ottsiv \/ Per. Chokaliuka S. M. \u2013 K.: Vyd. Presa Ukrainy, 2008. \u2013 367 s.5. Lototskyi O., prof. Ukrainski dzherela tserkovnoho prava. \u2013 Varshava, 1931. \u2013 318 s.6. Mykhailo Hrushevskyi. Istoriia ukrainskoi literatury. \u2013 K., 1995. \u2013 T. 6. \u2013 671 s.7. Pysmo Meletiia Smotrytskaho k Volnskomu chashnyku Lavrentiiu Drevenskomu s yzvestiem o Kievskom\u044a sobore 1628 h. Y opravdaniiamy po povodu svoei yzmen\u044b pravoslaviiu \/\/ Holubev S. Kievskii mytropolyt Petr Mohyla y eho spodvyzhnyky. \u2013 K.: Typohrafiia H. T. Korchak-Novytskaho, Mykhailovskaia ul. Sobstv. dom, 1883. T. 1 \u2013 559(1) + 576(2).8. Pysmo Meletiia Smotrytskaho k chlenam\u044a pravoslavnaho Vylenskaho bratstva \/\/ AIuZR. \u2013 K.: Typohrafiia H. T. Korsak-Novychkaho, Mykhailovskaia ulytsa, sobs. dom, 1883. T. VI. \u2013 Ch. I.: Akty o tserkovno-relyhioznykh otnosheniiakh v YuhshchZapadnoi Rusy. \u2013 938 s.9. Pryhlashenie ot Mytpolyta Iova Boretskaho pravoslavnym zhyteliam Zapadnoi Rossiy pryslat svoykh vybornykh v Kiev k prazdnyku Uspeniia Bozhiei Matery, dlia soveshchaniia o delakh Pravoslavnoi Zapadno-Russkoi Tserkvy. 1628 h. Maia 26 \/\/ Arkheohrafycheskii sbornyk dokumentov otnosiashchykhsia k ystoriy Severozapadnoi Rusy yzdavaemyi pry upravleniy Vylynskaho uchebnaho okruha. \u2013 Vylna: Pechatnia Hubernskaho Pravleniia, 1867. \u2013 T. II. \u2013 258(1)+SI(2)+27(3).10. Protestatsiia Meletiia Smotrytskaho protyv Kievskaho Sobora, byvshaho v avhuste 1628 \/\/ Holubev S. Kievskii mytropolyt\u044a Petr\u044a Mohyla y eho spodvyzhnyky. \u2013 K.: Typohrafiia H. T. Korchak-Novytskaho, Mykhailovskaia ul. Sobstv. dom, 1883. T. 1. \u2013 559(1) + 576(2).11. Sas P. M. Kyivskyi pravoslavnyi tserkovnyi sobor 1628 \/\/ Entsyklopediia istorii Ukrainy: T. 4: Ka-Kom \/ Redkol.: V. A. Smolii (holova) ta in. NAN Ukrainy. Instytut istorii Ukrainy. \u2013 K.: V-vo &#8220;Naukova dumka&#8221;, 2007. \u2013 528 s.12. Sovremennaia borshiura o Kievskom sobore, byvshem v avhuste 1628 h. \u0391\u03a0\u03a0\u039f\u039b\u039b\u0395\u0399\u0391 \/\/ Holubev S. Kievskii mytropolyt Petr Mohyla y eho spodvyzhnyky. \u2013 K. : Typohrafiia H. T. Korchak-Novytskaho, Mykhailovskaia ul. Sobstv. dom, 1883. T. 1. \u2013 559(1) + 576(2).13. Statut pro upravlinnia Ukrainskoi Pravoslavnoi Tserkvy Kyivskoho Patriarkhatu. [Elektronnyi resurs]. \u2013 Rezhym dostupu: https:\/\/www.cerkva.info\/pages\/statut.14. Meletiy Smotrzyskiy. Apologia peregrinatiey do Kraiow Wschodnych&#8230; \u2013 Lwow w Drukarni Jana Szeligi, Typographa, R. B., 1628. \u2013 204.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[85],"tags":[128],"class_list":["post-4229","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category--6-2018","tag-archpriest-volodymyr-vakin","post-no-thumbnail"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/vb.vpba.edu.ua\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4229","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/vb.vpba.edu.ua\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/vb.vpba.edu.ua\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vb.vpba.edu.ua\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vb.vpba.edu.ua\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4229"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/vb.vpba.edu.ua\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4229\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5559,"href":"https:\/\/vb.vpba.edu.ua\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4229\/revisions\/5559"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/vb.vpba.edu.ua\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4229"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vb.vpba.edu.ua\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4229"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vb.vpba.edu.ua\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4229"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}